NVIDIA Quadro M5000M vs NVIDIA Quadro P6000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro M5000M and 24GB VRAM Quadro P6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M5000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Quadro P6000 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1645MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.8GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M5000M
2.995 TFLOPS
Quadro P6000
+321%
12.63 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro M5000M
2810
Quadro P6000
+216%
8898
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro M5000M
1312
Quadro P6000
+216%
4147
Blender
Quadro M5000M
275
Quadro P6000
+200%
825
OctaneBench
Quadro M5000M
61
Quadro P6000
+191%
178
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
Oct 2016
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Pascal
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1506 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1645 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1127 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5X
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
432.8GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
30
1536
Shading Units
3840
96
TMUs
240
64
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
157.9 GPixel/s
93.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
197.4 GFLOPS
2.995 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
93.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
394.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GM204
GPU Name
GP102
N16E-Q5-A1
GPU Variant
GP102-875-A1
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
11.8 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
471 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
6.1
6.4
Shader Model
6.7
