NVIDIA Quadro M5000M vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro M5000M and 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M5000M 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 5GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 140.2GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1480MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M5000M
2.995 TFLOPS
Quadro P2000
+1%
3.031 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro M5000M
2810
Quadro P2000
+5%
2973
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro M5000M
1312
Quadro P2000
+2%
1350
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
Feb 2017
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1076 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1480 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1752 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
5GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
160bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
140.2GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
8
1536
Shading Units
1024
96
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
40
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.20 GPixel/s
93.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
94.72 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
47.36 GFLOPS
2.995 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.031 TFLOPS
93.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
94.72 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM204
GPU Name
GP106
N16E-Q5-A1
GPU Variant
GP106-875-A1
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
6.1
6.4
Shader Model
6.4
