NVIDIA Quadro M5000M vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro M5000M and 0GB VRAM Quadro P2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M5000M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 96.13GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1291MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M5000M
2.995 TFLOPS
Quadro P2000 Mobile
2.974 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro M5000M
+34%
2810
Quadro P2000 Mobile
2096
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro M5000M
1312
Quadro P2000 Mobile
+31%
1723
Blender
Quadro M5000M
+19%
275
Quadro P2000 Mobile
231
OctaneBench
Quadro M5000M
+12%
61
Quadro P2000 Mobile
54
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
Feb 2019
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1291 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1291 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
96.13GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
9
1536
Shading Units
1152
96
TMUs
72
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
41.31 GPixel/s
93.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
92.95 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
46.48 GFLOPS
2.995 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.974 TFLOPS
93.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
92.95 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM204
GPU Name
GP106
N16E-Q5-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
6.1
6.4
Shader Model
6.4
