NVIDIA Quadro M5000M vs NVIDIA Quadro P2200
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro M5000M and 5GB VRAM Quadro P2200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M5000M 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 5GB)
256 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P2200 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1493MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (200.2GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
Lower TDP (75W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M5000M
2.995 TFLOPS
Quadro P2200
+27%
3.822 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro M5000M
2810
Quadro P2200
+21%
3410
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro M5000M
1312
Quadro P2200
+17%
1536
Blender
Quadro M5000M
275
Quadro P2200
+17%
322
OctaneBench
Quadro M5000M
61
Quadro P2200
+3%
63
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
Jun 2019
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1493 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1251 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
5GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5X
256bit
Memory Bus
160bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
200.2GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
10
1536
Shading Units
1280
96
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
40
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.72 GPixel/s
93.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
119.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
59.72 GFLOPS
2.995 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.822 TFLOPS
93.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
119.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM204
GPU Name
GP106
N16E-Q5-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
6.1
6.4
Shader Model
6.4
