NVIDIA Quadro M5000M vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro M5000M and 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M5000M 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
Lower TDP (60W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M5000M
2.995 TFLOPS
Quadro T2000 Mobile
+22%
3.656 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro M5000M
2810
Quadro T2000 Mobile
+14%
3220
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro M5000M
1312
Quadro T2000 Mobile
+8%
1426
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1575 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
2001 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
128.1GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
1536
Shading Units
1024
96
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.12 GPixel/s
93.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
114.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.311 TFLOPS
2.995 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.656 TFLOPS
93.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
114.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
60W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM204
GPU Name
TU117
N16E-Q5-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.6
