Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M500M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

NVIDIA Quadro M500M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro M500M and 8GB VRAM Quadro RTX 4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M500M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 160W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 37% (1545MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (416.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M500M
0.863 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 4000 +724%
7.119 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
Nov 2018
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
1005 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1625 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
416.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
36
-
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
2304
16
TMUs
144
8
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
36
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

8.992 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.88 GPixel/s
17.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
222.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
14.24 TFLOPS
863.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.119 TFLOPS
26.98 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
222.5 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM108
GPU Name
TU104
N15M-Q3
GPU Variant
TU104-850-A1
Maxwell
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
Unknown
Transistors
13.6 billion
Unknown
Die Size
545 mm²

Board Design

30W
TDP
160W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
3x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy