Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M500M vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded

NVIDIA Quadro M500M vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro M500M and 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M500M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 60W)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 43% (1612MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M500M
0.863 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Embedded +856%
8.253 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
1117 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1612 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
20
384
Shading Units
2560
16
TMUs
80
8
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.992 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
77.38 GPixel/s
17.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
129.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.253 TFLOPS
863.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.253 TFLOPS
26.98 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
129.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
60W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM108
GPU Name
GA107S
N15M-Q3
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net