Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200

NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro M520 Mobile and 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
Lower TDP (25W vs 108W)
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Boost Clock784MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 40.10GB/s)
960 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M520 Mobile
0.8 TFLOPS
Quadro K4200 +163%
2.107 TFLOPS
OctaneBench
Quadro M520 Mobile
19
Quadro K4200 +68%
32
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2017
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
771 MHz
-
Boost Clock
784 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
40.10GB/s
Bandwidth
172.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
1344
16
TMUs
112
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.328 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.95 GPixel/s
16.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
87.81 GTexel/s
-
-
-
799.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.107 TFLOPS
24.98 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
87.81 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
108W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GM108
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
GK104-850-A2
Maxwell
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
3.54 billion
Unknown
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy