Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050

NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro M520 Mobile and 3GB VRAM Tesla C2050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
Lower TDP (25W vs 238W)
NVIDIA Tesla C2050 's Advantages
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (144.0GB/s vs 40.10GB/s)
64 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M520 Mobile
0.8 TFLOPS
Tesla C2050 +28%
1.028 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2017
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
40.10GB/s
Bandwidth
144.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
14
-
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
448
16
TMUs
56
8
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

8.328 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
16.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
799.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
24.98 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM108
GPU Name
GF100
-
GPU Variant
GF100-850-A3
Maxwell
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
3.1 billion
Unknown
Die Size
529 mm²

Board Design

25W
TDP
238W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy