Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro M5500 Mobile and 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.4GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 53% (1785MHz vs 1165MHz)
Lower TDP (60W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M5500 Mobile +30%
4.772 TFLOPS
Quadro T2000 Mobile
3.656 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1140 MHz
Base Clock
1575 MHz
1165 MHz
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
2001 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
224.4GB/s
Bandwidth
128.1GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
2048
Shading Units
1024
128
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

74.56 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.12 GPixel/s
149.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
114.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.311 TFLOPS
4.772 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.656 TFLOPS
149.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
114.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
60W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
TU117
-
-
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy