Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile vs NVIDIA RTX A2000

NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile vs NVIDIA RTX A2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro M5500 Mobile and 6GB VRAM RTX A2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 3% (1200MHz vs 1165MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 224.4GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M5500 Mobile
4.772 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 +67%
7.987 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
Aug 2021
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1140 MHz
Base Clock
562 MHz
1165 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
224.4GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
26
2048
Shading Units
3328
128
TMUs
104
64
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
104
-
RT Cores
26
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

74.56 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
149.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.987 TFLOPS
4.772 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
149.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
124.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
70W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
GA106
-
GPU Variant
GA106-850-A1
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
12 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
276 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
8.6
6.4
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy