Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition

NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM Quadro M6000 24 GB and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1114MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (317.4GB/s vs 20.80GB/s)
3040 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M6000 24 GB +10114%
6.844 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
0.067 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Sep 2008
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

988 MHz
Base Clock
-
1114 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
317.4GB/s
Bandwidth
20.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
3072
Shading Units
32
256
TMUs
16
96
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
3 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

106.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.160 GPixel/s
285.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.320 GTexel/s
-
-
-
6.844 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
66.56 GFLOPS
213.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
42W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM200
GPU Name
G84
GM200-880-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
8 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
601 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy