Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM Quadro M6000 24 GB and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 2700M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1114MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (317.4GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
3024 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M6000 24 GB +5288%
6.844 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 2700M
0.127 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

988 MHz
Base Clock
-
1114 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
799 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
317.4GB/s
Bandwidth
51.14GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
6
-
Compute Units
-
3072
Shading Units
48
256
TMUs
24
96
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
3 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

106.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.480 GPixel/s
285.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.72 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
6.844 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
127.2 GFLOPS
213.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GM200
GPU Name
G94
GM200-880-A1
GPU Variant
NB9E-GLM2
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
8 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
601 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
65W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy