Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro K620

NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro K620

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM Quadro M6000 24 GB and 2GB VRAM Quadro K620 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (24GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (317.4GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K620 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 1% (1124MHz vs 1114MHz)
Lower TDP (45W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M6000 24 GB +693%
6.844 TFLOPS
Quadro K620
0.863 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

988 MHz
Base Clock
1058 MHz
1114 MHz
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
317.4GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
3072
Shading Units
384
256
TMUs
24
96
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
3 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

106.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.98 GPixel/s
285.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.98 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
6.844 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
863.2 GFLOPS
213.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
26.98 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM200
GPU Name
GM107
GM200-880-A1
GPU Variant
GM107-850-A2
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
601 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
45W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
5.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy