Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290

NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM Quadro M6000 24 GB and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 290 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1114MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (317.4GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
3056 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 's Advantages
Lower TDP (21W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M6000 24 GB +23500%
6.844 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 290
0.029 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Oct 2007
Quadro
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

988 MHz
Base Clock
-
1114 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
317.4GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
2
-
Compute Units
-
3072
Shading Units
16
256
TMUs
8
96
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
3 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB

Theoretical Performance

106.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.836 GPixel/s
285.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.672 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
6.844 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
29.38 GFLOPS
213.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GM200
GPU Name
G86
GM200-880-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
8 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
601 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
21W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DMS-59
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy