Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P1000

NVIDIA Quadro M6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P1000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 12GB VRAM Quadro M6000 and 4GB VRAM Quadro P1000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M6000 's Advantages
More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (317.4GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
2432 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P1000 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 33% (1480MHz vs 1114MHz)
Lower TDP (47W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M6000 +261%
6.844 TFLOPS
Quadro P1000
1.894 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2015
Release Date
Feb 2017
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

988 MHz
Base Clock
1266 MHz
1114 MHz
Boost Clock
1480 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
317.4GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
5
3072
Shading Units
640
192
TMUs
40
96
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
3 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

106.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
47.36 GPixel/s
213.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.60 GFLOPS
6.844 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.894 TFLOPS
213.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
47W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM200
GPU Name
GP107
-
GPU Variant
GP107-860-A1
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
8 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
601 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
6.1
6.4
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy