Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M6000 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded

NVIDIA Quadro M6000 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 12GB VRAM Quadro M6000 and 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M6000 's Advantages
More VRAM (12GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (317.4GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 45% (1612MHz vs 1114MHz)
Lower TDP (60W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M6000
6.844 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Embedded +20%
8.253 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Mar 2015
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

988 MHz
Base Clock
1117 MHz
1114 MHz
Boost Clock
1612 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
317.4GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
20
3072
Shading Units
2560
192
TMUs
80
96
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
3 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

106.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
77.38 GPixel/s
213.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
129.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.253 TFLOPS
6.844 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.253 TFLOPS
213.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
129.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
60W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM200
GPU Name
GA107S
-
-
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
8 billion
Transistors
Unknown
601 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
8.6
6.4
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net