Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M6000 vs AMD Instinct MI300A

NVIDIA Quadro M6000 vs AMD Instinct MI300A

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 12GB VRAM Quadro M6000 and 128GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M6000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (250W vs 760W)
AMD Instinct MI300A 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 89% (2100MHz vs 1114MHz)
More VRAM (128GB vs 12GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 317.4GB/s)
11520 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M6000
6.844 TFLOPS
AMD Instinct MI300A +1691%
122.6 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2015
Release Date
Dec 2023
Quadro
Generation
Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

988 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1114 MHz
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
5200 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM3
384bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
317.4GB/s
Bandwidth
5300GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
228
3072
Shading Units
14592
192
TMUs
880
96
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
3 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

106.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
213.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
980.6 TFLOPS
6.844 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
122.6 TFLOPS
213.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
61.3 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM200
GPU Name
MI300
-
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
8 billion
Transistors
146 billion
601 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
760W
600 W
Suggested PSU
1000 W
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy