Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M600M vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100

NVIDIA Quadro M600M vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro M600M and 48GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max 1100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 300W)
Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 77% (1550MHz vs 876MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
6784 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M600M
0.673 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Max 1100 +3201%
22.22 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

837 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
876 MHz
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
7168
16
TMUs
448
8
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
204 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.008 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
14.02 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
694.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.22 TFLOPS
672.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.22 TFLOPS
21.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
22.22 TFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
300W
-
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 12-pin

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
-
-
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
100 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy