Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M600M vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded

NVIDIA Quadro M600M vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro M600M and 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 60W)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 84% (1612MHz vs 876MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M600M
0.673 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Embedded +1126%
8.253 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

837 MHz
Base Clock
1117 MHz
876 MHz
Boost Clock
1612 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
20
384
Shading Units
2560
16
TMUs
80
8
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.008 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
77.38 GPixel/s
14.02 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
129.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.253 TFLOPS
672.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.253 TFLOPS
21.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
129.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
60W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GA107S
-
-
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
Unknown
148 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy