Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 130M vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 130M vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 130M and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 130M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 51W)
NVIDIA Quadro K2000D 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
376 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 130M
0.013 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000D +5538%
0.733 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2007
Release Date
Mar 2013
NVS Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
11.20GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
1
SM Count
-
8
Shading Units
384
8
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
16 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
-
-
-
12.80 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS

Board Design

10W
TDP
51W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G86
GPU Name
GK107
G86-613-A2
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy