Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 130M vs NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 130M vs NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 130M and 32GB VRAM Tesla PG503 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 130M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1530MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
5112 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 130M
0.013 TFLOPS
Tesla PG503 216 +120438%
15.67 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2007
Release Date
Nov 2019
NVS Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1312 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1530 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1106 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
32GB
DDR2
Memory Type
HBM2
64bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
11.20GB/s
Bandwidth
1133GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
1
SM Count
80
8
Shading Units
5120
8
TMUs
320
4
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
195.8 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
489.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
31.33 TFLOPS
12.80 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
15.67 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
7.834 TFLOPS

Board Design

10W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G86
GPU Name
GV100
G86-613-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
7.0
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy