Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA Quadro K6000

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA Quadro K6000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 160M and 12GB VRAM Quadro K6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 225W)
NVIDIA Quadro K6000 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock902MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
2872 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 160M
0.023 TFLOPS
Quadro K6000 +22491%
5.196 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Jul 2013
NVS Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-I
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
797 MHz
-
Boost Clock
902 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
11.20GB/s
Bandwidth
288.4GB/s

Render Config

1
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
8
Shading Units
2880
4
TMUs
240
4
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
16 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.320 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
54.12 GPixel/s
2.320 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
216.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
23.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.196 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1.732 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G98
GPU Name
GK110B
NB9M-GS
GPU Variant
GK110-890-B1
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Board Design

12W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
-
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.5
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy