Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA Quadro P1000

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA Quadro P1000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 160M and 4GB VRAM Quadro P1000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 47W)
NVIDIA Quadro P1000 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1480MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
632 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 160M
0.023 TFLOPS
Quadro P1000 +8134%
1.894 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Feb 2017
NVS Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-I
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1266 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1480 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
11.20GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
1
SM Count
5
8
Shading Units
640
4
TMUs
40
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.320 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
47.36 GPixel/s
2.320 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.60 GFLOPS
23.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.894 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
59.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

12W
TDP
47W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G98
GPU Name
GP107
NB9M-GS
GPU Variant
GP107-860-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
65 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
6.1
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy