Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA Tesla M2050

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA Tesla M2050

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 160M and 3GB VRAM Tesla M2050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 225W)
NVIDIA Tesla M2050 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (148.4GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
440 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 160M
0.023 TFLOPS
Tesla M2050 +4378%
1.03 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Jul 2011
NVS Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-I
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
773 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
11.20GB/s
Bandwidth
148.4GB/s

Render Config

1
SM Count
14
-
Compute Units
-
8
Shading Units
448
4
TMUs
56
4
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.320 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.10 GPixel/s
2.320 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
23.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1030 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
515.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G98
GPU Name
GF100
NB9M-GS
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Board Design

12W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
2.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy