Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI50

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI50

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 160M and 16GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI50 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI50 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1746MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1020GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
3832 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 160M
0.023 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI50 +58204%
13.41 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Nov 2018
NVS Mobile
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-I
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1200 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1746 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
64bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
11.20GB/s
Bandwidth
1020GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
60
1
SM Count
-
8
Shading Units
3840
4
TMUs
240
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
16 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.320 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
111.7 GPixel/s
2.320 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
419.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
26.82 TFLOPS
23.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.41 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
6.705 TFLOPS

Board Design

12W
TDP
300W
-
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G98
GPU Name
Vega 20
NB9M-GS
GPU Variant
Vega 20 GLXT
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 5.1
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
13.23 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
331 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy