Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 160M and 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 5600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
Lower TDP (12W vs 171W)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 's Advantages
More VRAM (1536GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (76.80GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
120 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 160M
0.023 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 5600 +1404%
0.346 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Mar 2007
NVS Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-I
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
11.20GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
1
SM Count
16
8
Shading Units
128
4
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB
L2 Cache
96 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.320 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.40 GPixel/s
2.320 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
23.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
345.6 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

12W
TDP
171W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
-
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

G98
GPU Name
G80
NB9M-GS
GPU Variant
G80-875-A2
Tesla
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
90 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
1.0
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy