Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 160M and 4GB VRAM RTX A1000 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 60W)
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1627MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
2040 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 160M
0.023 TFLOPS
RTX A1000 Embedded +28873%
6.664 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Jan 2022
NVS Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-I
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1192 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1627 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
11.20GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

1
SM Count
16
-
Compute Units
-
8
Shading Units
2048
4
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

2.320 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
78.10 GPixel/s
2.320 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
104.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.664 TFLOPS
23.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.664 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
104.1 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G98
GPU Name
GA107S
NB9M-GS
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
65 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
Unknown
86 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

12W
TDP
60W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy