Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 160M and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 5 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
7672 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 160M
0.023 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 2T +59986%
13.82 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Jan 2021
NVS Mobile
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-I
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
64bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
11.20GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

1
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
8
Shading Units
7680
4
TMUs
240
4
ROPs
120
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
16 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

2.320 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.0 GPixel/s
2.320 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
216.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
27.65 TFLOPS
23.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.82 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
3.456 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G98
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
NB9M-GS
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
65 nm
Process Size
10 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
8 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Board Design

12W
TDP
500W
-
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy