Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA Tesla M1060

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA Tesla M1060

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 160M and 2GB VRAM Tesla M1060 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 188W)
NVIDIA Tesla M1060 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
232 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 160M
0.023 TFLOPS
Tesla M1060 +2604%
0.622 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Jun 2008
NVS Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-I
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
512bit
11.20GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

1
SM Count
30
-
Compute Units
-
8
Shading Units
240
4
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
16 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.320 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.52 GPixel/s
2.320 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
23.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G98
GPU Name
GT200B
NB9M-GS
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Board Design

12W
TDP
188W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
1.3
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy