Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA Tesla S870

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA Tesla S870

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 160M and 1536MB VRAM Tesla S870 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
Lower TDP (12W vs 800W)
NVIDIA Tesla S870 's Advantages
More VRAM (1536GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (76.80GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
120 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 160M
0.023 TFLOPS
Tesla S870 +1404%
0.346 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
May 2007
NVS Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-I
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
11.20GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s

Render Config

1
SM Count
16
-
Compute Units
-
8
Shading Units
128
4
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
16 KB
L2 Cache
96 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.320 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.40 GPixel/s
2.320 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
23.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
345.6 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

G98
GPU Name
G80
NB9M-GS
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
90 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²

Board Design

12W
TDP
800W
-
Suggested PSU
1200 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
1.0
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy