Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA Quadro K620M

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA Quadro K620M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 290 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K620M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 's Advantages
Lower TDP (21W vs 30W)
NVIDIA Quadro K620M 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (14.40GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
368 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 290
0.029 TFLOPS
Quadro K620M +2875%
0.863 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2007
Release Date
Mar 2015
Quadro NVS
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1029 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
384
8
TMUs
16
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.836 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.992 GPixel/s
3.672 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.98 GTexel/s
-
-
-
29.38 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
863.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
26.98 GFLOPS

Board Design

21W
TDP
30W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DMS-59
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G86
GPU Name
GM108
-
GPU Variant
N15M-Q3
Tesla
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
Unknown
127 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
5.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy