Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA GRID K220Q

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA GRID K220Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 290 and 512MB VRAM GRID K220Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 's Advantages
Lower TDP (21W vs 225W)
NVIDIA GRID K220Q 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1520 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 290
0.029 TFLOPS
GRID K220Q +7793%
2.289 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2007
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro NVS
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

2
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
16
Shading Units
1536
8
TMUs
128
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
16 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

1.836 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
3.672 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
29.38 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G86
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

21W
TDP
225W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy