Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA Quadro M4000M

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA Quadro M4000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 290 and 4GB VRAM Quadro M4000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 's Advantages
Lower TDP (21W vs 100W)
NVIDIA Quadro M4000M 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1264 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 290
0.029 TFLOPS
Quadro M4000M +8506%
2.496 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2007
Release Date
Aug 2015
Quadro NVS
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
1280
8
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.836 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
3.672 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
78.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
29.38 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.496 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
78.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

21W
TDP
100W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DMS-59
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G86
GPU Name
GM204
-
GPU Variant
N16E-Q3-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
5.2
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy