Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA Tesla P40

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA Tesla P40

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 290 and 24GB VRAM Tesla P40 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 's Advantages
Lower TDP (21W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla P40 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1531MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (347.1GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
3824 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 290
0.029 TFLOPS
Tesla P40 +40451%
11.76 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2007
Release Date
Sep 2016
Quadro NVS
Generation
Tesla Pascal
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1303 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1531 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1808 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
24GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
347.1GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
30
16
Shading Units
3840
8
TMUs
240
4
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.836 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
147.0 GPixel/s
3.672 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
367.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
183.7 GFLOPS
29.38 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.76 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
367.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

21W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

G86
GPU Name
GP102
-
-
-
Tesla
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
16 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
11.8 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
471 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
6.1
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy