Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA Quadro M5000

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA Quadro M5000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 290 and 8GB VRAM Quadro M5000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 's Advantages
Lower TDP (21W vs 150W)
NVIDIA Quadro M5000 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1038MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (211.6GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2032 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 290
0.029 TFLOPS
Quadro M5000 +14562%
4.252 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2007
Release Date
Jun 2015
Quadro NVS
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
861 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1038 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
211.6GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
2048
8
TMUs
128
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.836 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
66.43 GPixel/s
3.672 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
132.9 GTexel/s
-
-
-
29.38 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.252 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
132.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

21W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

G86
GPU Name
GM204
-
GPU Variant
GM204-875-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
5.2
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy