Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 290 and 6GB VRAM Quadro P3000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 's Advantages
Lower TDP (21W vs 75W)
NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1215MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.3GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1264 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 290
0.029 TFLOPS
Quadro P3000 Mobile +10624%
3.11 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2007
Release Date
Jan 2017
Quadro NVS
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1088 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1215 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
192bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
168.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
10
16
Shading Units
1280
8
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.836 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
58.32 GPixel/s
3.672 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
97.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
48.60 GFLOPS
29.38 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.110 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
97.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

21W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DMS-59
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G86
GPU Name
GP104
-
GPU Variant
N17E-Q1-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
16 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
6.1
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy