Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 290 and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 's Advantages
Lower TDP (21W vs 150W)
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock771MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2288 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 290
0.029 TFLOPS
Quadro K5200 +12151%
3.553 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2007
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro NVS
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
667 MHz
-
Boost Clock
771 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
2304
8
TMUs
192
4
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.836 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.01 GPixel/s
3.672 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
148.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
29.38 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.553 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

21W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

G86
GPU Name
GK110B
-
-
-
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.5
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy