Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 290 and 6GB VRAM Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 's Advantages
Lower TDP (21W vs 80W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1380MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1904 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 290
0.029 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh +18172%
5.299 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2007
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro NVS
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
945 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1380 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
192bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
336.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
30
16
Shading Units
1920
8
TMUs
120
4
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
240
-
RT Cores
30
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.836 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
88.32 GPixel/s
3.672 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
165.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.60 TFLOPS
29.38 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.299 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
165.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

21W
TDP
80W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DMS-59
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G86
GPU Name
TU106
-
GPU Variant
N19E-Q1-KD-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy