Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 290 and 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 's Advantages
Lower TDP (21W vs 60W)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock1612MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2544 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 290
0.029 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Embedded +28358%
8.253 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2007
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro NVS
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1117 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1612 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
20
16
Shading Units
2560
8
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.836 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
77.38 GPixel/s
3.672 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
129.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.253 TFLOPS
29.38 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.253 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
129.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

21W
TDP
60W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DMS-59
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G86
GPU Name
GA107S
-
-
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
80 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
Unknown
127 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy