CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded
VS
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 290 and 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 's Advantages
Lower TDP (21W vs 60W)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock1612MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2544 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 290
0.029 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Embedded
+28358%
8.253 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 290
VS
RTX A2000 Embedded
Graphics Card
Oct 2007
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro NVS
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1117 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1612 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
20
16
Shading Units
2560
8
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.836 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
77.38 GPixel/s
3.672 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
129.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.253 TFLOPS
29.38 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.253 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
129.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
21W
TDP
60W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DMS-59
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G86
GPU Name
GA107S
-
-
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
80 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
Unknown
127 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 FHHL
2
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB
3
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
4
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA Tesla M2090
5
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA Quadro GV100
6
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA GRID M10 8Q
7
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA Quadro P620 Mobile
8
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA Tesla T10 Processor
9
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE
10
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Mobile
Related News
1
CPU-Z Minor Update: Support for Intel's Four New Products and New Memory
2
CXMT Reportedly Achieves 80% Yield in DDR5 Production
3
Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N
4
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
5
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
6
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
7
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
8
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
9
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
10
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy