Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 FHHL

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 FHHL

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 290 and 16GB VRAM Tesla V100 FHHL to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 's Advantages
Lower TDP (21W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla V100 FHHL 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1290MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (829.4GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
5104 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 290
0.029 TFLOPS
Tesla V100 FHHL +45451%
13.21 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2007
Release Date
Mar 2018
Quadro NVS
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
937 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1290 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
810 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR2
Memory Type
HBM2
64bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
829.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
80
16
Shading Units
5120
8
TMUs
320
4
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.836 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
165.1 GPixel/s
3.672 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
412.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
26.42 TFLOPS
29.38 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.21 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
6.605 TFLOPS

Board Design

21W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G86
GPU Name
GV100
-
-
-
Tesla
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
7.0
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy