Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 DGXS 16 GB

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 DGXS 16 GB

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 290 and 16GB VRAM Tesla V100 DGXS 16 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 's Advantages
Lower TDP (21W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla V100 DGXS 16 GB 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1530MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (897.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
5104 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 290
0.029 TFLOPS
Tesla V100 DGXS 16 GB +53934%
15.67 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2007
Release Date
Mar 2018
Quadro NVS
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1327 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1530 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
876 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR2
Memory Type
HBM2
64bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
897.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
80
16
Shading Units
5120
8
TMUs
320
4
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.836 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
195.8 GPixel/s
3.672 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
489.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
31.33 TFLOPS
29.38 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
15.67 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
7.834 TFLOPS

Board Design

21W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G86
GPU Name
GV100
-
-
-
Tesla
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
7.0
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy