Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 295 and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2200 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 55W)
NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1036MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (88.13GB/s vs 11.12GB/s)
1016 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 295
0.021 TFLOPS
Quadro M2200 Mobile +10004%
2.122 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2009
Release Date
Jan 2017
Quadro NVS
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
695 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1036 MHz
695 MHz
Memory Clock
1377 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
11.12GB/s
Bandwidth
88.13GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
1
SM Count
-
8
Shading Units
1024
4
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.160 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
33.15 GPixel/s
2.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
66.30 GTexel/s
-
-
-
20.80 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.122 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
66.30 GFLOPS

Board Design

23W
TDP
55W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G98
GPU Name
GM206
-
-
-
Tesla
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
5.2
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy