Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M vs NVIDIA Quadro K2100M

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M vs NVIDIA Quadro K2100M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro NVS 320M and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 55W)
NVIDIA Quadro K2100M 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 1 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (48.13GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
544 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 320M
0.074 TFLOPS
Quadro K2100M +937%
0.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Jul 2013
NVS Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
752 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
22.40GB/s
Bandwidth
48.13GB/s

Render Config

4
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
32
Shading Units
576
16
TMUs
48
8
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
32 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

4.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.004 GPixel/s
9.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.02 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
73.60 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
32.02 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
GK106
-
GPU Variant
N15P-Q3-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
2.54 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
221 mm²

Board Design

20W
TDP
55W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy