NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16 vs NVIDIA A10M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16 and 24GB VRAM A10M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 53% (2495MHz vs 1635MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 24GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 600.2GB/s)
NVIDIA A10M 's Advantages
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 295W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16
+161%
61.32 TFLOPS
A10M
23.44 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2023
Release Date
Feb 2022
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
Tesla Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1855 MHz
Base Clock
975 MHz
2495 MHz
Boost Clock
1635 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
864.0GB/s
Bandwidth
600.2GB/s
Render Config
96
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
56
6144
Shading Units
7168
384
TMUs
224
192
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
224
96
RT Cores
56
256 KB per Array
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
96 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
479.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
130.8 GPixel/s
958.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
366.2 GTexel/s
122.6 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
23.44 TFLOPS
61.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.44 TFLOPS
1.916 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
732.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
295W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
3x DisplayPort 2.1
1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
Navi 31
GPU Name
GA102
Navi 31
GPU Variant
-
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
5 nm
Process Size
8 nm
57.7 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.7
Shader Model
6.7
