Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128MB VRAM Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 42W)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (512GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (20.80GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
32 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2006
Release Date
Sep 2008
Quadro NVS
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
250 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

128MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
8.000GB/s
Bandwidth
20.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
-
Shading Units
32
8
TMUs
16
4
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
-
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

1.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.160 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.320 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
-
FP32 (float)
66.56 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

NV43
GPU Name
G84
NVS440 NPB
GPU Variant
-
Curie
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
110 nm
Process Size
80 nm
0.146 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
154 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Board Design

31W
TDP
42W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DMS-59
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
3.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy