Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16 vs NVIDIA Tesla M2050

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16 vs NVIDIA Tesla M2050

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128MB VRAM Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16 and 3GB VRAM Tesla M2050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 225W)
NVIDIA Tesla M2050 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (148.4GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2006
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro NVS
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
250 MHz
Memory Clock
773 MHz

Memory

128MB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
8.000GB/s
Bandwidth
148.4GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
14
-
Compute Units
-
-
Shading Units
448
8
TMUs
56
4
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

1.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.10 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
-
FP32 (float)
1030 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
515.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

NV43
GPU Name
GF100
NVS440 NPB
GPU Variant
-
Curie
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
110 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.146 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
154 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Board Design

31W
TDP
225W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DMS-59
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
3.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy