Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K200M

NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K200M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro P1000 Mobile and 1024MB VRAM Quadro K200M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1519MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.13GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 40W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P1000 Mobile +376%
1.555 TFLOPS
Quadro K200M
0.326 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2017
Release Date
Aug 2014
Quadro Pascal-M
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1493 MHz
Base Clock
-
1519 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
96.13GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

4
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
512
Shading Units
192
32
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

24.30 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
48.61 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
24.30 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.555 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
48.61 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP107
GPU Name
GK107
N18P-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
N14M-Q1
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Board Design

40W
TDP
35W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy