Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P1000 vs Intel Arctic Sound-M

NVIDIA Quadro P1000 vs Intel Arctic Sound-M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro P1000 and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P1000 's Advantages
Boost Clock1480MHz
Lower TDP (47W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
7552 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P1000
1.894 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound M +678%
14.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2017
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1266 MHz
Base Clock
-
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
5
SM Count
-
640
Shading Units
8192
40
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

47.36 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
29.60 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
59.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS

Board Design

47W
TDP
500W
200 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

GP107
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
GP107-860-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Generation 12.5
Samsung
Foundry
Intel
14 nm
Process Size
10 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
8 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy