Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P1000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

NVIDIA Quadro P1000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro P1000 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P1000 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1480MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
608 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (47W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P1000 +2267%
1.894 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2017
Release Date
Jun 2007
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

1266 MHz
Base Clock
-
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

5
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
640
Shading Units
32
40
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

47.36 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
29.60 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
59.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GP107
GPU Name
G84
GP107-860-A1
GPU Variant
NB8P-GLM
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
80 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Board Design

47W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy